valid publication造句

• Saccardo respectively, the remainder for lack of any valid publication.
• In bacteriology, a valid publication of a name requires the deposition of the bacteria in a Bacteriology Culture Collection.
• The sources themselves are valid, since they come from valid publications, regardless of their relation to the subject.
• It was first described by German validly published, and American botanist William Ralph Maxon later described the species in a valid publication.
• The fossil was inconsistent with the typical characteristics of the genus and it was not a valid publication because no Latin name was identified with it.
• I'm unsure about them-- on the one hand, assuming they are valid publications, and I'm sure they are, the sources are reliable.
• The genera " Quiina " and " Touroulia " had been known since 1775, when they were described by requirements for valid publication of a botanical name.
• Also, he described a number of species from the moss genus " Orthotrichum " that received valid publication ( Bruch ex Brid . ) from Swiss bryologist Samuel Elis閑 Bridel-Brideri ( 1761 1828 ).
• In botanical nomenclature, a "'validly published name "'is a name that meets the requirements in the " International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants " for valid publication.
• Valid publication of a name represents the minimum requirements for a botanical name to exist : terms that appear to be names but have not been validly published are referred to in the " ICN " as " designations ".
• Chester 1901 is automatically created by the valid publication of " Mycobacterium avium " subsp . " paratuberculosis " ( Bergey et al . 1923 ) and the valid publication of " Mycobacterium avium " subsp . " silvaticum"
• Chester 1901 is automatically created by the valid publication of " Mycobacterium avium " subsp . " paratuberculosis " ( Bergey et al . 1923 ) and the valid publication of " Mycobacterium avium " subsp . " silvaticum"
• The genus name " Wollumbinia " was erected by Wells, 2007, however, this paper was declared to be in breach of the ICZN code defining a valid publication, ICZN Articles 8 and 9 and Recommendation 8D . As such this name is not considered valid.
• The first instance of valid publication of a name of a type of the [ . . . ] name of the genus to which it is assigned is to repeat the generic name unaltered as its epithet, not followed by an author citation [ . . . ] Such names are termed autonyms ".
• I am not sure if we have a massive case of refspam, or a valid publication with valid references . ( copied from WP : WPSPAM because probably should confirm if anyone thinks this blog is an RS first . . . ) "'7 "'06 : 08, 24 February 2012 ( UTC)
• The first instance of valid publication of a name of an infraspecific taxon under a legitimate species name automatically establishes the corresponding autonym ( see also Art . 32.8 and 11.6 ) . " And as above, but now for infraspecific taxa, Art . 26.1 says : " The name of any infraspecific taxon that includes the type of the [ . . . ] name of the species to which it is assigned is to repeat the specific epithet unaltered as its final epithet, not followed by an author citation [ . . . ] Such names are termed autonyms ".